Tuesday, August 9, 2011

The Search for the Meaning of October

Octo (latin): Eight

Up until 45 B.C., there were only ten months in the Roman calendar, and October had been the eighth month. After the assassination of Julius Caesar by his ally and colleague, Brutus, the months of July and August had been added to the Roman calendar, in honour of Julius (July) Caesar and his successor, Augustus "Octavius" (August) Caesar.

There are other more relatively recent times that come into sharp focus when tracing the history of the days of October:

October 24, 1929
October 19, 1987
October 5, 2008

1929 vs 2011



"The economy had been growing robustly for most of the so-called Roaring Twenties. It was a technological golden age as innovations such as radio, automobiles, aviation, telephone and the power grid were deployed and adopted. Companies that had pioneered these advances, like Radio Corporation of America (RCA) and General Motors, saw their stocks soar. Financial corporations also did well as Wall Street bankers floated mutual fund companies (then known as investment trusts) like the Goldman Sachs Trading Corporation. Investors were infatuated with the returns available in the stock market especially with the use of leverage through margin debt."

"The Roaring Twenties, the decade that led up to the Crash was a time of wealth and excess. Despite caution of the dangers of speculation, many believed that the market could sustain high price levels. Shortly before the crash, economist Irving Fisher famously proclaimed, "Stock prices have reached what looks like a permanently high plateau." However, the optimism and financial gains of the great bull market were shattered on "Black Thursday", October 24, 1929, when share prices on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) collapsed. Stock prices plummeted on that day, and continued to fall at an unprecedented rate for a full month. The October 1929 crash came during a period of declining real estate values in the United States (which peaked in 1925) near the beginning of a chain of events that led to the Great Depression, a period of economic decline in the industrialized nations."

(source: Wikipedia, events leading up to the stock market crash of 1929)

"On March 25, 1929, the stock market suffered a mini-crash. It was a prelude of what was to come. As prices began to drop, panic struck across the country as margin calls were issued. When banker Charles Mitchell made an announcement that his bank would keep lending, his reassurance stopped the panic. Although Mitchell and others tried the tactic of reassurance again in October, it did not stop the big crash. By the spring of 1929, there were additional signs that the economy might be headed for a serious setback. Steel production went down; house construction slowed; and car sales waned. At this time, there were also a few reputable people warning of an impending, major crash; however, as month after month went by without one, those that advised caution were labeled pessimists and ignored."

(source: http://history1900s.about.com/od/1920s/a/stockcrash1929.htm)






In 2011, perhaps the styles of dress had changed, but the ideologies that existed in the 1920s remained firmly intact. It was a technological golden age as innovations such as the internet, electric cars, space shuttles, mobile/ smart phones, and solar power were deployed and adopted. Companies that had pioneered these advances, such as Apple, Microsoft, Google and Tesla, saw their stocks soar.

Women were liberated from the archetype of the sterile housewife from the 1950s, similar to that of the advent of flappers from the 1920s who were casting off the 19th century era of female sexual repression. Vestiges of the old economic era, Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan Chase were still around, but this time, with strong ties in government. People were still buying stocks on margin; banks and lenders were utilising leverage to gauge their positions.


What is different about 1929 from 2011 is that instead of radio telecasts spreading mass panic about the stock market, influencing people's choices in what to invest, and manipulating the market through popular discourse; we have added to these methods, ratings agencies who work with investment banks to spread inaccurate information to manipulate the market in their favour.

Who are these ratings agencies, and why are they a threat to global economy?

Never had a tripartite of agencies, S&P, Moody's and Fitch, had such collective power as to sway the global market. Being integral to the housing collapse in 2008 and the stock market crash, they have singularly worked to manipulate investors into buying toxic CDOs and other such junk investments for their own personal gain. They even have the power to threaten governments if their legislation is not up to their personal satisfaction. When S&P leaked that they would downgrade US credit last Thursday, US companies in the stock market collectively lost 2 trillion dollars of their value in a period of three days. Similarly the Asian markets also followed suit and the Nikkei was down 3.5% at open.

On August 4, 2011, we suffered a mini-crash. It will be a prelude to what is to come if we continue to allow ratings agencies to manipulate the global market and make demands on the government to change legislation to suit their personal interests.

What happens this coming October is still unclear. Will we enter a second Depression? Will there be another stock market crash? One thing seems to be clear, if we don't strip ratings agencies of their power, these Bruti will most certainly create panic situations in which they will profit from betting against the US economy.


Sunday, August 7, 2011

Standard & Poor's: The Benedict Arnold of Our Time

“Neglected by Congress below, distressed with the small-pox; want of Generals and discipline in our Army, which may rather be called a great rabble, our credit and reputation lost, and great part of the country; and a powerful foreign enemy advancing upon us, are so many difficulties we cannot surmount them.” -Benedict Arnold, American traitor



Much has been debated over weekend since S&P downgraded the credit of United States. But let's look at the underlying motivations of the S&P, namely who are the S&P? 


S&P is owned by McGraw Hill and Co. On their board of directors are various pharmaceutical, insurance, and oil industry heads, along with companies that are heavily invested in the pharmaceutical and oil industries. Let's drop some names:


Sidney Taurel
Chairman Emeritus
Eli Lilly and Company


Edward B. Rust, Jr.
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
State Farm Insurance Companies


Hilda Ochoa-Brillembourg
Founder, President and Chief Executive Officer
Strategic Investment Group (heavily invested in pharmaceutical industries)


Sir Winfried Bischoff
Chairman
Lloyds Banking Group plc

Director of Eli Lilly and Company


McGraw Hill and Co. also owns Platts, which is not surprisingly, an energy company focused on oil and coal.

 

When President Obama announced in April 2011 that he will increase taxes for the oil and pharmaceutical industries, the board of directors at McGraw Hill and Companies were not pleased. As such, Standard & Poor's countered President Obama's proposed tax increases with a threat to downgrade US Credit based on nothing but a political ploy to create a standoff in the debt ceiling bill to prevent the passage of these tax increases on the pharmaceutical and oil industries. 


Instead, Standard & Poor's created baseless accusations of Congress being deadlocked and that they were merely the messengers of an inept government that reached a debt ceiling deal at the last hour. In truth, they were never the messengers who spoke truth. They utilised their position to profit interminably throughout the 1980s and 1990s to the financial crisis that lead to the stock market crash of 2008. They had no compunction nor moral nor even financial numbers to validate the A nor AA+ nor AAA credit ratings they gave so easily to the companies they were heavily invested, but now suddenly, with President Obama as the sophomore Congressman who took the reign of the old boys club by sheer determination and forcible wit with a diplomatic centrist view, and had decided to do what he promised- to end the era of Reagan-economics, Standard & Poor's- who are now faced with increased taxes to their beloved pharmaceutical and oil industries, decided to suddenly slap the US with a credit downgrade. Under all the pontificating rhetoric they have issued over the weekend, what they really mean is this:


"Yo, Obama, if you don't knock if off and cut taxes for the pharmaceutical and oil industries, we're gonna push the US Dollar under a bus, then we will see who will win!"


A true traitor, what S & P have effectively accomplished is that they have thrown the first dice into a dismal fire. This credit downgrade is not merely "psychological", the credit rating will now be utilised in a political battle between the GOP and other members of Congress to push their own agenda. Not only that, but now China and other nations who hold US debt can openly justify why they will raise interest rates to further deteriorate the US economy. Standard & Poor's, an American company, have effectively betrayed their own long-term interests for short term gain.

 

And who will pay for this credit downgrade? The average American citizen. Gone are the days when one family member was able to comfortably support a family, since the 1950s- (when tax rates were the highest for oil industries), now in 2011 (when tax rates are the lowest in history for these industries) as a two-person income, most Americans were still struggling to support a family


So which industries will be impacted by President Obama's tax increases? It won't be the average American citizen who probably makes less than $500K/year. The industries that will be most affected are the oil, pharmaceutical and insurance companies, the very companies that are represented in McGraw Hill and Companies, the one who downgraded US credit on "principle": Standard & Poor's.